Michael Shellenberger’s explosive testimony accuses the CIA and USAID of treason, alleging a 2019 plot via OCCRP to impeach Trump. Was it a betrayal of democracy or just political gamesmanship?
This is very important. There are other characters and bad actors that were also in the works against our President Trump who stands up to all the tyranny
Complete baloney because only Congress has any authority to impeach the President not any executive agencies. Congress not only has the right but the moral duty to impeach the President if the President has committed high crimes or misdemeanors or violated his oath to preserve, protect and defend the US Constitution in any way. Opposing the President isn't treason. Treason is giving aid to foreign powers that violate US sovereignty or seek our nation's destruction.
Neither side is challenging the other’s witnesses. They’re just taking turns criticising the other side. They’re both engaging in suppression of speech, trump rather ham-handedly and the dems in a much more sophisticated and insidious way. I approve of neither but there’s an honesty about the former’s approach that renders it less harmful.
This is very important. There are other characters and bad actors that were also in the works against our President Trump who stands up to all the tyranny
Treason!
Thank u for posting. . . Most informative!! 👍🇺🇸💞🙏✝️
what do Schiff, Yovanovitch, Sundland, and Vindman all have in common? Be careful, though, noticing is antisemitic.
Complete baloney because only Congress has any authority to impeach the President not any executive agencies. Congress not only has the right but the moral duty to impeach the President if the President has committed high crimes or misdemeanors or violated his oath to preserve, protect and defend the US Constitution in any way. Opposing the President isn't treason. Treason is giving aid to foreign powers that violate US sovereignty or seek our nation's destruction.
Johnson calling trump “co-President”. I’m sure he’s proud of himself but to me he just looks ignorant and attention-hungry.
Neither side is challenging the other’s witnesses. They’re just taking turns criticising the other side. They’re both engaging in suppression of speech, trump rather ham-handedly and the dems in a much more sophisticated and insidious way. I approve of neither but there’s an honesty about the former’s approach that renders it less harmful.